Kimberly Birrell vs Janice Tjen Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 02 Nov at 11:18 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
K. Birrell vs J. Tjen

AUS
0
Win
Played
1
Win

INA
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Birrell 0 - 1 Tjen
They have played 2 sets in total, with Kimberly Birrell winning 0 and Janice Tjen winning 2. The last match between Janice Tjen and Kimberly Birrell was at the Chennai Open - Chennai, 02-11-2025, Round: F, Surface: Hard, with Janice Tjen getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Birrell | 0 |
| Tjen | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(F) Chennai Open - Chennai(11-02-25)
K. Birrell vs J. Tjen H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $961,016 | Career Prize Money | $235,544 |
| 54.81% (262-216) | Career Total W/L | 83.44% (126-25) |
| 0 | Hard | 1 |
| 7 | Titles | 15 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 47.37% (18-20) | YTD Win/Loss | 76.92% (10-3) |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
K. Birrell vs J. Tjen Match Preview:
- When analyzing second serve performance, Janice Tjen has a slight edge, winning 39.82% of her points compared to Kimberly Birrell's 37.78%. How is this relevant? It often correlates with predicting match outcomes.
- In return games, Kimberly Birrell shows strength, securing 51.36% against opponents' second serves, exceeding Janice Tjen’s 46.84%. Could this indicate her potential advantage in return games? Yes, as it strongly correlates with match predictions.
- For first serve returns, Birrell again leads with 31.16% over Tjen’s 28.97%. Does this suggest an upper hand on return games? Likely so.
- Under pressure, Birrell saves more breakpoints at 55.17%, compared to Tjen's 50.15%, which can be crucial during critical match moments.
- Looking at overall match results over the past year, Tjen has a higher win rate (85.71%) than Birrell (53.85%). What does this imply? Tjen's consistent success potentially favors her in this matchup.
- Examining surface preference, Tjen excels on Indoor Hard courts with a 100% win rate, whereas Birrell performs best on Hard courts at 100% as well, but with more experience there. How does this affect their encounter? Surface familiarity might benefit both, yet Tjen's diversification might be advantageous.
- In terms of player level and event experience, Tjen has participated mainly in Challengers/ITF tournaments, winning 84.93% of matches, while Birrell has experience on the Main tour, winning 58.33% of her matches. Does experience level affect predictions? Yes, event level played can influence outcomes.
- Tjen has faced opponents with a lower average ranking (315.82) compared to Birrell (154.14), suggesting Birrell has competed against stronger players.
- If the match goes to a deciding set, Tjen holds a 62% success rate, providing a distinct edge over Birrell's 39% win rate in such circumstances.
- Current event performance statistics should also be considered to gauge recent in-form players and inform predictions effectively.
Editorial Prediction (November 2, 2025, UTC):
The comparison of second serve and return statistics indicates a nuanced balance between Janice Tjen and Kimberly Birrell. Tjen edges out slightly in second serve success, while Birrell demonstrates strength in return games.
Considering performance under pressure, Birrell’s ability to save breakpoints might prove crucial, yet Tjen’s superior overall win rate over the past year suggests a competitive edge.
Surface preferences reveal that although both players display expertise on different hard court types, Tjen’s diversity in surface success adds an advantage.
Experience levels suggest Birrell's familiarity with higher-ranked opponents provides resilience, yet Tjen’s favorable deciding set record presents her as a tenacious competitor.
Based on these evaluations, Janice Tjen appears as the likely contender to secure victory in the upcoming match against Kimberly Birrell.
Kimberly Birrell vs Janice Tjen Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
K. Birrell vs J. Tjen H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 7 | Games Won | 12 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 2:0:41 | Average Match Time | 2:0:41 |
| 71% (42/59) | 1st Serve % | 62% (58/93) |
| 57% (24/42) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (37/58) |
| 24% (4/17) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (16/35) |
| 14% (2/14) | Break Pts Won % | 83% (5/6) |
| 43% (40/93) | Return Points Win % | 53% (31/59) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
K. Birrell Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SF | L | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | ||
QF | W | 6-3 6-2 | ||
R2 | W | 7-6(5) 6-1 | ||
R1 | W | 7-5 6-2 | ||
Rubber 1 | W | 6-4 3-6 6-1 | ||
J. Tjen Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
F | W | 6-4 6-3 | ||
SF | W | 7-6(6) 7-6(5) | ||
QF | W | 6-3 6-1 | ||
R2 | W | 2-6 6-3 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-7(5) 6-2 | ||

K. Birrell vs J. Tjen Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54.81% (262/216) | YTD Win/Loss | 83.44% (126/25) |
| 53.55% (603/523) | Sets Win/Loss | 79.51% (260/67) |
| 51.57% (5465/5132) | Games Win/Loss | 63.53% (1817/1043) |
| 57.78% (193/141) | Hard Win/Loss | 81.82% (108/24) |
| 40.38% (21/31) | Clay Win/Loss | 92.86% (13/1) |
| 51.72% (15/14) | Indoor Hard W/L | 100.00% (5/0) |
| 52.38% (33/30) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.27 |
| 824 | Aces Total | 382 |
| 0.35 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
| 1820 | Total Double Faults | 316 |
| 1:36:27 | Average Match Time | 1:24:2 |
| 426.36 | Average Opponent Rank | 343.44 |
| 63% (18880/30010) | 1st Serve % | 65% (5280/8174) |
| 64% (12028/18880) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (3619/5280) |
| 45% (5023/11133) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (1503/2894) |
| 45% (1709/3795) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (657/1315) |
| 45% (13784/30782) | Return Points Win % | 50% (4425/8867) |
| 42.11% (16/22) | Slam W/L | 80.00% (4/1) |
| 45.45% (15/18) | Masters W/L | 66.67% (2/1) |
| 37.50% (3/5) | Cups W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 50.00% (49/49) | Main Tour W/L | 81.82% (9/2) |
| 59.49% (163/111) | Challenger W/L | 79.55% (70/18) |
| 59.26% (16/11) | Futures W/L | 95.35% (41/2) |
| 55% (258/472) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 84% (125/149) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 49% (61/125) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 64% (18/28) |
| 53% (90/170) | Deciding Set Win % | 69% (18/26) |
| 85% (249/212) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 94% (123/116) |
| 15% (249/37) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 5% (123/6) |
| 21% (229/49) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 36% (28/10) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Argentina Open – Buenos Aires Preview And Prediction: Varvara Lepchenko vs Panna Udvardy Betting Tips & Picks November 30, 2025

Mayar Sherif vs Varvara Lepchenko Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

Mayar Sherif vs Varvara Lepchenko Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

James Duckworth vs Dane Sweeny Prediction – ATP Playford Challenger – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

Mayar Sherif vs Caroline Dolehide Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 28th November 2025 Best Bets
